*
Don't get me wrong, I adore him and I respect him, but Gary Sandberg was just odd at this week's council meeting.
Sandberg seemed be saying that since we can't enforce every last ordinance/law each and every time, no new ordinances should be put on the books.
Sandberg was seething and/or severly sleep deprived by Fourth of July thugs shooting off illegal fireworks on his street. He had an odd, though colorful, display of fireworks gathered on his desk to "prove" that the police were not doing their job.
Jeeze, Gary, like the cops didn't have more important crimes to worry about on July 4th? Did you see how many drunks were on the riverfront?!
Well, you know what they say about madness and genius, so I forgive.
Wednesday, July 6
Fido gets the death penalty in Peoria Heights
*
Poor Fido. In response to a pit bull attack suffered by a young boy, the Village of Peoria Heights has started imposing a fine for dogs found without a leash. $200 for the first offense and $500 for every offense thereafter.
The intent is good but the implementation is idiotic. Most people who let their dogs run wild won't pay $500 to get Fido back. There are some people, especially in the Heights, who may love their dog dearly but could never raise that kind of cash.
I seriously doubt that this policy will prevent any more attacks. More likely, there will be an increase of dogs picked up without tags. Most likely, Peoria Heights will be responsible for putting down a lot more dogs.
Poor Fido. In response to a pit bull attack suffered by a young boy, the Village of Peoria Heights has started imposing a fine for dogs found without a leash. $200 for the first offense and $500 for every offense thereafter.
The intent is good but the implementation is idiotic. Most people who let their dogs run wild won't pay $500 to get Fido back. There are some people, especially in the Heights, who may love their dog dearly but could never raise that kind of cash.
I seriously doubt that this policy will prevent any more attacks. More likely, there will be an increase of dogs picked up without tags. Most likely, Peoria Heights will be responsible for putting down a lot more dogs.
Get your checkbook... Time to pay the stormwater "fee"
*
Grab your ankles. You're about to get spanked. Again. We didn't whine loudly enough regarding the garbage "fee" currently applied to our water bills, so, as expected, more "fees" are coming.
A fee charged by the City is simply a tax that isn't tax deductible. The newest fee being discussed is a stormwater tax - er - I mean, fee.
In some areas of Peoria - especially in older neighborhoods and the Rolling Acres Subdivision- stormwater is a real problem. With every rain, basements flood. This is due to the fact that the City has done very little to provide repair and upkeep of its stormwater system over the years. In some places retention walls are crumbling. Erosion has been allowed to progress to the point that in one neighborhood, there is a house that has actually slid and settled on the edge of a retention wall.
In order to do necessary repairs, the City has to gain right-of-way privileges. These repairs require deep digging and heavy equipment which takes a toll on landscape and property. It is possible the City will have to go to Court to get access to some properties. Regardless, because of the neglect the system has suffered, we are looking at least a $17 Million bill to fix the problem.
So...According to today's Peoria Times Observer North, the City is considering a wastewater user fee, raising the sales tax to 8.9 percent or raising property taxes 16 percent. DeWayne Bartels from The Observer wrote that such an increase would increase taxes $51.53 on a $100,000 home.
I'm guessing that they will go with the fee. Elections are four years away for district council members and two years off for those who run At-Large. They can up the fee a few bucks and hope folks will put it behind them before election time.
The highest voter turnout always lies in the fourth and fifth districts, and they will not forgive a property tax increase. (If you live in Weaver Ridge, relax. Pat Nichting of the Fifth would never vote for a fee or tax increase no matter how worthy. I'd find this admirable except for the fact that he has, on occasion, voted for pork.)
No matter how Council chooses to solve the problem, people will be peeved. Those in newer areas, who already pay high property taxes and have no drainage problems, will be ticked when forced to pay the plumbing bills of those who live in the poorer South Side and East Bluff. I have one fifth district friend who put it this way, "I'm already paying for public schools I'd never send my own kids to, now I have to pay for someone else's ditches too? It's not my water that's running into their basement."
Grab your ankles. You're about to get spanked. Again. We didn't whine loudly enough regarding the garbage "fee" currently applied to our water bills, so, as expected, more "fees" are coming.
A fee charged by the City is simply a tax that isn't tax deductible. The newest fee being discussed is a stormwater tax - er - I mean, fee.
In some areas of Peoria - especially in older neighborhoods and the Rolling Acres Subdivision- stormwater is a real problem. With every rain, basements flood. This is due to the fact that the City has done very little to provide repair and upkeep of its stormwater system over the years. In some places retention walls are crumbling. Erosion has been allowed to progress to the point that in one neighborhood, there is a house that has actually slid and settled on the edge of a retention wall.
In order to do necessary repairs, the City has to gain right-of-way privileges. These repairs require deep digging and heavy equipment which takes a toll on landscape and property. It is possible the City will have to go to Court to get access to some properties. Regardless, because of the neglect the system has suffered, we are looking at least a $17 Million bill to fix the problem.
So...According to today's Peoria Times Observer North, the City is considering a wastewater user fee, raising the sales tax to 8.9 percent or raising property taxes 16 percent. DeWayne Bartels from The Observer wrote that such an increase would increase taxes $51.53 on a $100,000 home.
I'm guessing that they will go with the fee. Elections are four years away for district council members and two years off for those who run At-Large. They can up the fee a few bucks and hope folks will put it behind them before election time.
The highest voter turnout always lies in the fourth and fifth districts, and they will not forgive a property tax increase. (If you live in Weaver Ridge, relax. Pat Nichting of the Fifth would never vote for a fee or tax increase no matter how worthy. I'd find this admirable except for the fact that he has, on occasion, voted for pork.)
No matter how Council chooses to solve the problem, people will be peeved. Those in newer areas, who already pay high property taxes and have no drainage problems, will be ticked when forced to pay the plumbing bills of those who live in the poorer South Side and East Bluff. I have one fifth district friend who put it this way, "I'm already paying for public schools I'd never send my own kids to, now I have to pay for someone else's ditches too? It's not my water that's running into their basement."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)